You Are a Potential Terrorist,
If You're on This List

Just when you thought you had ducked safely under the radar, stockpiled food and ammo without anyone noticing, you turn up on the government's list of potential threats to national security, better known as Main Core. "Darn, how did that happen," you think. "I was so careful not to be noticed. They must have spies everywhere." Good observation. They do.

Cheer up, you're in good company. Anybody who's anybody is on the list with you. I know, that's not much relief, but hey, what was a list of only about 8 million Americans just a few months ago is probably half of the country by now. Feel better?

When you think about it, having a list of possible trouble-makers is probably a good idea, especially if you're a corrupt and power-hungry government and you want to keep control over the people you've been fooling into thinking that you care about them. Releasing the criteria you use to round up these miscreants will send the message loud and clear that you, as dictator, don't actually give a damn about people at all. In fact, by making the criteria broad enough to include everyone but your immediate family and scumbag colleagues, you guarantee that everyone who would love to hang you for treason and murder is locked up in FEMA camps. Your personal note to FEMA: Build more camps pronto.

So, lets have a look at the list of criteria by which our loving politicians sort out who is a threat to their continued exploitation of us and our country. The list is long, and that's to be expected. Can't let anyone who even thinks bad thoughts about our dictator go unpunished. That would be caving in to the First Anmendment's guarantee of free speech and thought. Ready? Here goes...

The List of Criteria for Potential Terrorists:

1. Those who believe in Individual liberties - Wow, what a great start. All those Bill of Rights fanatics- arrest them all. Who needs liberties? We have King Obama and a nanny state that takes care of us. Check.

2. Those that believe in State’s rights - Let's see, the States created the Federal Government and can dissolve it if they want. But if you believe that, you're a terrorist. Go figure.

3. Those who want to make the world a ‘better place’ - Yeah, let's make the world a worse place, like politicians do. Check.

4. "Colonists who sought to free themselves from British Rule" - Colonists? Wow, are they still around? They must be really old, and still a threat at their age!

5. Those who want to defeat communism -Like the US has faked for decades? so, now that's bad? Oh right, two legs good, four legs better.

6. Those that believe "that the interests of one’s own nation are separate from the interests of other nations or the common interest of all nations" - Hmmm, right, let's try to control the whole world, while our own people starve. Check.

7. Anyone that holds a "political ideology that considers the state to be unnecessary, harmful,or undesirable" - You mean like making wars on innocent people, bombing children, Napalming villages, supporting dictators, democide, bailouts... ? Totally desireable and necessary. Check.

8. Anyone that possesses an "intolerance toward other religions" - Who might that be? 'Intolerance', as in "I don't like religions"? Well, I don't really have any interest in religions, but I'm tolerant. What, exactly does 'intolerance' look like? KKK activity? Oops, the KKK actually has strong ties that go way back to the Democratic Party, Obama.

9. Those that "take action to fight against the exploitation of the environment and/or animals" - You mean it's now uncool to protect this planet from exploitation by corporations who don't give a shit? So oil spills and radioactive contamination are now good for us? Check.

10. "Anti-Gay" - You mean 'anti' as in "I don't like?" Oh, so the First Amendment is now obsolete? I can't dislike anything? Can I dislike those who are anti-gay? Are you now dictating what is acceptable thought? And if I'm anti-politician, is that terrorism or patriotism?

11. "Anti-Immigrant" - Hey, most of us are immigrants and decendants of immigrants. You mean the deliberate importation of criminals from Central America and Mexico to create chaos, crime, poverty, racial conflicts and more slaves to the feds? Totally cool.

12. "Anti-Muslim" - As in "I'd rather not be Muslim" or as in "I hate Muslims"? What if I hate politicians? Hey, for all the US posturing about Islam, I don't see a single point here about Muslims except that we can't be anti-Muslim. Go figure. Oh, I get it, Hussein Obama's Muslim Brotherhood.

13. "The Patriot Movement" - So, now we don't like anybody who's loyal to his country or its people? Check.

14. "Opposition to equal rights for gays and lesbians" - So now we can't oppose anything we don't like? I oppose corrupt policians who make ridiculous lists like this. How about equal rights for Americans, as outlined in the Bill of rights?

15. Members of the Family Research Council - This sounds fair, I mean do we really want people doing research on families?

16. Members of the American Family Association - And this too, an association of families - sounds really suspect. Planned Parenthood, formerly Eugenics Incorporated, now there's a noble cause, sterilizing the Third World. How thoughtful.

17. Those that believe that Mexico, Canada and the United States "are secretly planning to merge into a European Union-like entity that will be known as the ‘North American Union’" - The feds have released documents that spell all this out. So now we're not supposed to believe what the feds tell us about their plans for the NAU? It's out in the open, so sure, let's round up people who think it's a 'secret' plan. Check.

18. Members of the American Border Patrol/American Patrol - The folks who follow the Constitution and try to keep out illegal immigrants, we now don't like them? They are suspect? Or is it because they won't cooperate with the intentional destrucion of the border with Mexico?

19. Members of the Federation for American Immigration Reform - Reformists? Can't have any reform. Round 'em up.

20. Members of the Tennessee Freedom Coalition - Freedom? Coalitionists? Sounds provocative, even revolutionary. Round 'em up.

21. Members of the Christian Action Network - Action, that sounds too proactive. Must be troublemakers. Round 'em up.

22. Anyone that is "opposed to the New World Order" - NWO - You mean those rich sociopaths who manufacture wars and manipulate politics and nations for their own amusement? Why would anyone oppose that gagle of scumbags and turds that won't flush? I say promote them all. Nelson Rockefeller first.

23. Anyone that is engaged in "conspiracy theorizing" - I don't know anybody like that. We're all pretty sure that these conspiracies are fact. But hey, if we find anyone still 'theorizing' about our corrupt, tyrannical government, well set them straight.

24. Anyone that is opposed to Agenda 21 - Sure, let's hand over our sovereignty to a bunch of non-elected UN power freaks in Manhatten who are hell-bent on world domination and enslaving all of us. Who would oppose that? Check.

25. Anyone that is concerned about FEMA camps - Why would anyone be 'concerned' about these concentration camps which will only be used to "keep us safe" from, well, people on this list. In other words, the camps are for us! See, no need for concern.

26. Anyone that "fears impending gun control or weapons confiscations" - Okay, a few guns were confiscated after Katrina and maybe in half a dozen other places in Boston, but it was all in the name of keeping Americans safe, and testing plans for martial law. And some laws were passed in New York and Connecticut to register guns, which 85% of citizens ignored. Our politicians have reassured us that they are not coming for our guns, and as they always tell the truth, we have nothing to worry about, unless history repeats itself. Could they be lying to us?

27. The militia movement - Oh yeah, this is really troubling, even though the Constitution requires every State to have its own militia, composed of armed citizens.

28. The sovereign citizen movement - Who'd ever want to be involved in this? Our government is on our side, right?

29. Those that "don’t think they should have to pay taxes" - Why would anyone not want to support the corrupt bankers at the Federal Reserve and the illegal wars that our tax dollars make possible? How unpatriotic. Check.

30. Anyone that "complains about bias" - Yeah, every time I hear someone complain about bias, I lose my tolerance.

31. Anyone that "believes in government conspiracies to the point of paranoia" - Our government has been involved in so many conspiracies, there really isn't any paranoia about it, nor do we still relegate facts of history to mere 'belief'. Gulf of Tonkin 'attack' that never happened and got us into the Vietnam War wasn't a conspiracy? Sinking the Lusitania? 9-11, Building 7 collapse, Pentagon hit by plane that vaporized, chemtrails, fluoridated water, war for profit, war on drugs by the world's biggest drug dealer, sex slave trade by the CIA... Why would anyone be paranoid?

32. Anyone that "is frustrated with mainstream ideologies" - Mainstream ideolgies, like what? Democracy? Two-party system? Capitalism? Why would anyone be frustrated by a system that works to enslave them and make rich people richer? That's ungrateful.

33. Anyone that "visits extremist websites/blogs" - If you suspect your government of corruption and scandal, you're an extremist. Wow, that's like suspecting Colgate of secretly manufacturing toothpaste, or claiming that Exxon-Mobile has been caught refining oil. Obama lies, except when he says he's good at killing people or when he talks about predator drones. If you find any of these truths online, you must be a terrorist.

34. Anyone that "establishes website/blog to display extremist views" - You mean like this one? 'Extreme', as in "The goverment is corrupt!? That's not extreme anymore, it's like "Politicians lie", and "Bankers are greedy" - pretty much common knowledge. 'Extremist views' might be like "I saw the Earth from Mars", or "I think we should all be cannibals", or like the Skull and Boneheads, "I think we should sacrifice babies in our sick, sociopathic ceremony". Extremist (and delusional) is thinking that you are above the Constitution, that God is not watching you, and that you will get away with murder, Obama.

35. Anyone that "attends rallies for extremist causes" - There goes 'right to assemble'. What is an 'extremist cause' anyway? Like 'Patriotism'?

36. Anyone that "exhibits extreme religious intolerance" - 'Extreme', as in "I am extremely intolerant of other people shoving their religions down my throat"? Is that also 'exhibition'?

37. Anyone that "is personally connected with a grievance" - Wow, now we can't even grieve? My friend grieves for her father who died. Can I be 'personally connected' with her? I hold Obama guilty of murder and treason. Is that a grievance? I don't feel personally connected.

38. Anyone that "suddenly acquires weapons" - Suddenly, as in buying a gun at the store in a single day, as opposed to taking a week to buy it?

39. Anyone that "organizes protests inspired by extremist ideology" - 'Extremist', as in "I am extremely upset about government corruption"? I hereby protest against government trashing the First Amendment, which reads... "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances."

40. "Militia or unorganized militia" - Already covered. Besides, some of them are well organized.

41. "General right-wing extremist" - I should think so - right-wing extremist generals would be a threat, at least to Obama. Good call. Check.

42. Citizens that have "bumper stickers" that are patriotic or anti-U.N. - 'Go America!' bumber stickers, bad, God bless the UN, good? Suggested bumper sticker: "Gun Control: the ability to hit a blue helmet from 100 meters." You're already on the list, why not have fun?

43. Those that refer to an "Army of God" - God has an army? Cool! Where do I enlist?

44. Those that are "fiercely nationalistic (as opposed to universal and international in orientation)" - Can't one be both? I am. I love my country (but not its government) and I love other countries as parts of a universal family.

45. Those that are "anti-global" - 'Anti', as in "I'm not a globe", or as in "I don't like globalists", or as in "Let's take care of our own people first, and if we can take care of others later, we will". Or 'Anti', as in anti-globalist sociopaths, Bilderbergers, NWO criminals? Like that? Check.

46. Those that are "suspicious of centralized federal authority" - The States created the Federal Government and can dissolve it if it becomes a threat to them or to the people. Obama has become all three branches of government and a dictator. Should we be suspicious? Hmmm

47. Those that are "reverent of individual liberty" - Who needs the Bill of Rights? All bow in reverence to King Obama!

48. Those that "believe in conspiracy theories" - Not theories, really, more like truths based on the governments own released documents. If they don't want us believing our government is involved in conspiracies and has been for decades, they should stop publishing the details and bragging about them publically. Duh.

49. Those that have "a belief that one’s personal and/or national ‘way of life’ is under attack" - NSA spying, police brutality, degraded education, water fluoridation, chemtrails, bailouts, Patriot Act, NDAA, Obama ruling by executive orders... But hey, everything's cool. Go back to sleep.

50. Those that possess "a belief in the need to be prepared for an attack either by participating in paramilitary preparations and training or survivalism" - Right, the Boy Scouts and the Mormons are crazy; what could go wrong that anyone would need to 'be prepared' for an emergency? Just look at how responsive FEMA was after Katrina. Yup, folks you can cound on. Anybody hear of Obama's attempt to detonate an EMP over the USA? Ah, but don't worry, he's our leader, it must have been for our own good. Under attack by our own government? Absurd.

51. Those that would "impose strict religious tenets or laws on society (fundamentalists)" - You mean like Obama is doing with his endless executive orders? Expect Sharia Law any day now.

52. Those that would "insert religion into the political sphere" - You mean like the founding fathers did? Oops, sorry, "In God we trust" is not religious, it's spiritual. Is it okay to insert 'spirituality' into the political sphere? Apparently not, that's why it's spiritually bankrupt.

53. Anyone that would "seek to politicize religion" - No real need, it's already political enough.

54. Those that have "supported political movements for autonomy" - So supprting legal political movements is now illegal? How about breaking the bonds with Britain? Was that 'bad'? Oh, that was good, but it's not okay when the tyrants are the feds? Check.

55. Anyone that is "anti-abortion" - 'Anti', as in "I don't want an abortion", or "I don't want others to have an abortion", or as in "I think we have to talk about what abortion means and leave politics out of the discussion". Perhaps we should 'insert spirituality' into the discussion.

56. Anyone that is "anti-Catholic" - 'Anti' as in "I'm not Catholic", or as in "I don't like Catholics" or as in "I hate Catholics", or as in "I'm anti-Catholic"? What if I'm against anti-Catholics? Why is the CIA-supported ISIS killing Christians? Oh, I get it, they're not Catholics. Duh. Obama is anti-Catholic. Is he on the list?

57. Anyone that is "anti-nuclear" - 'Anti' as in "I don't like nukes", or as in "I don't like nuclear energy", or as in "I think Fukushima, Chernobyl, and Three-Mile Island are reasons to be concerned". Or is it anti-Newtonian Physics? "I'm anti-nucleus, pro electron, oh and neutron-tolerant."

58. "Rightwing extremists" - As in beliefs? We can't have our own beliefs? My extreme beliefs don't have wings, but why should anybody care?

59. "Returning veterans" - Of course, let's label vets as potential terrorists. After all, they took an oath to defend the Constitution. Ah, that's it, they won't allow the feds to take over this country. And they're armed. That's why the feds are declaring them mentally unfit and taking their guns, then sending them back to fight overseas. Makes perfect sense.

60. Those concerned about "illegal immigration" - The government is bussing and flying illegal immiigrants in by the thousands. They have no money and no means of support, so locals have to shoulder the burden of housing and feeding them. Many are criminals and many have diseases. But why be concerned? Being concerned is terrorism. Check.

61. Those that "believe in the right to bear arms" - "Believe in", as in respect the 2nd Amendment? Hmmm, I thought every federal employee takes an oath to defend the Constitution, which, by the way, has 27 Amendments, including the 2nd, the right to keep an bear arms. That's bad? Do you "believe in" the 2nd Amendment? That's like asking "Do you believe in your mother?" Like she won't exist if I don't believe in her? The 2nd Amendment exists, whether I or anybody believes in it or not. It's the law, and nowhere in the Constitution does Congress or the President get the power to regulate gun ownership or to pass any law contradicting the Constitition. All laws on gun control are illegal. Check mate.

62. Anyone that is engaged in "ammunition stockpiling" - As in having some at home? How about the feds, buying billions of rounds. That's not stockpiling? Oh, they can have ammo but we can't, I get it. The feds want a monopoly on force. Check.

63. Anyone that exhibits "fear of Communist regimes" - Wow, you are a terrorist if you fear Obama's regime? Most of us have no fear of Russia or China, but Obama's dictatorial regime is bordering on communist. Well, he was raised and groomed by communists, so why would he not practice what he was preached? Fear of Obama, bad. Check.

64. "Anti-abortion activists" - How about inactive activists? Or pro-abortion inactivists? Neither does anything. Ah, so it's activism, that's the threat? Check.

65. Those that are against illegal immigration - You mean those who support the Constitution which states that the borders must be secure? Obama actually sued Arizona for defending it's borders and objecting to illegals being dumped in the state. So Obama sided with Mexico and the drug cartels against Arizona. Makes perfect sense. Illegal immigration, good. Check.

66. Those that talk about "the New World Order" in a "derogatory" manner - Why would anybody be derogatory about a bunch of elite sociopaths who think they are chosen by God to rule the planet and to enslave the rest of us? We should encourage them to colonize Mars and leave this planet alone.

67. Those that have a negative view of the United Nations - Who could have a negative view of this fine group of criminals who want to dominate the planet, sterilize poor people and eliminate most of us. Nice bunch. Just look at all the perks we get from their Agenda 21. Slavery. Disarmament. Domination. What's not to like?

68. Those that are opposed "to the collection of federal income taxes" - You mean there are people who won't pay their fare share to make war on innocent people and to funnel billions to rich bankers who hold us hostage? How unpatriotic and shameful.

69. Those that supported former presidential candidates Ron Paul, Chuck Baldwin and Bob Barr - Oh, right, these guys are constitutionalists, that won't do. Constitution, bad; dictators, good. Check.

70. Those that display the Gadsden Flag ("Don’t Tread On Me") - How about a flag or bumper sticker that says 'Tread On Me'? That would be cool, no? How about bumper stickers that say "Baby on Bord"? Oh, right... babies, bad; sterilization, good. How about "God bless the New World Order, with Herpes"

71. Those that believe in "end times" prophecies - We can't even believe what we want? So now we have 'Belief Crimes'. "What, you believe in a prophecy? You're a Belief Criminal! Officer, arrest this guy. He believes in a prophecy". Wait, it's coming.

72. Evangelical Christians - I'm confused. Doesn't the First Amendment guarantee freedom of religion? Not any more. I wonder what Evangelical Christians did to get on the wrong side of Obama. Pray for his demise? Maybe they didn't vote for him. I like them already.

So, if you have been 'caught' thinking (Thought-Crime), believing (Belief Crime) speaking (Dissent) or doing (Terrorism) any of the above-mentioned 'crimes', by the governments NSA spying apparatus, you may assume that you are on the list of potential terrorists who will be the first to be rounded up and 'detained' (locked up indefinitely) at one of your friendly neighborhood FEMA (concentration) camps for re-education, or perhaps just disposal.

Should this actually happen, you will be among friends, but you may not enjoy your extended stay. Remember, in 1942 this government rounded up 127,000 American citizens of Japanese ancestry, and locked them in internment (concentration) camps for the duration of World War II. 'Interns' knew that if they escaped they would be shot. Many of them had sold their homes and businesses for a fraction of their value, because they feared they would not be there on their return. When the war ended and the 'prisoners' were finally released, they were not welcome back in their own communities (thanks to government propaganda), as anti-Japanese sentiments were high, and some villages posted signs telling them not to return. Homeless and without anything, many scattered across the country.

This is how a government can, will and does treat its own citizens. "Oh, but that couldn't happen today." Really? Have a look at the list above and tell me you really believe our government wouldn't carry out it's plan to round up hundreds of thousands of people and lock them away. This is what governments do to stay in power, when they fear the people are about to rise up against them.

But wait, it gets worse. If you are on the 'other list', the U.S. Government 's Consolidated Terrorist Watch List, maintained by the FBI's Terrorist Screening Center (TSC), you are, at this moment, on the monitor of someone in Virginia, not a photo of you, but a dot on a map indicating your current location. That's right, you are being tracked in real time. Now, it's not easy to find out if you are on that list, but all you have to do is to try to board a plane in an airport and you will be taken out of line and searched nicely if you are. Your boarding card will have four Ss (SSSS), and you will face 'extra care' every time you fly. They always know where you are, unless you ditch your cell phone and don't drive your vehicle. We're not chipped (yet), so we can't be tracked electronically if we have no trackable electronics with us. Now you know how to get off their screen, or to remain in one spot on it. You can also mail your cell phone to another place and use another vehicle. If you really need to disappear, there are books on it.

But wait, it gets even worse. Cameras with microphones by the zillions are being installed in cities across the country, and have been for years, in streetlights, on buildings, fences, walls, towers, and they are equipped with face-recognition software and some have body scanners to see if you carry a gun. So even if you have no chip, no electronics and no vehicle, if you are in a city outfitted with these cameras, you can be tracked. Hitler, if were alive today, would be green with envy at the technology we have developed to spy on citizens every minute, everywhere.

It doesn't take a braniac to see what the government has been doing. Dissent is now labeled as 'terrorism', activism is labeled as 'treason'. Once they have these labels established, it's easy to deal with those who oppose corrupt government in any way. If we even speak something the government considers 'extremist', we can be arrested and detained, indefinitley, thanks to the NDAA. The First Amendment is no longer there to protect free speech.

Obama and his NSA have crossed the line big time. He has demonstrated that he is not interested in what we the people want. Need more evidence that he doesn't care about you? Check this: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YiJBCxc0soM)

The NSA is now so powerful, it is another undeclared branch of the government, spying on everyone, including members of Congress and the president. When you spy on someone, read their emails, listen to their phone conversations, eventually you will find something you can use for blackmail. And if you don't find it, you can create it and make it stick. Why do you suppose Congress is full of wimps? They have to go along with Obama or they will be exposed for having sex with children, for taking drugs, for porn, adultery, tax evasion, embezzeling or some other crime. Sadly, some of our Congress wimps are actually guilty of crimes for which they could be ruined politically, so they play ball. Need some evidence? Look up Franklin Child Sex Slave Scandal in connection with the White House. You'll find enough in a few minutes to become disgusted, so don't get stuck in that mess. There are plenty of other, more recent, scandals to read up on, if you can stomach them.

Can anybody figure out why Eric Holder is still employed? I mean, if you or I were to sell or give a single rifle to a Mexican drug boss, what do you suppose would happen to us? Right, felon for life, prison for life. But our government has proved again and again that if you do a crime big enough, and you're obedient to Obama, you don't even get charged with it. Instead, you get promoted. The IRS, used for generations as a tool to punish opposing political supporters, is once again caught with dirty hands. And so on. The current government, now with the lowest approval rating in history, less than 8%, our politicians have hit the bottom and don't seem to care. What better way to deal with unruly Americans than to brand them all as potential terrorists and lock them in concentration camps for daring to support the Constitution, free speech or the right to dissent.

And if you really want to piss off the powers that be, try reading the Declaration of Independence in public. Now, you'd think that the document that embodies the spirit of freedom from tyranny, the one that proclaimed the right of the States to dissolve the bonds which bound them to Britain, would be held in high regard by our government. You'd be wrong. Oh, the first few sentences are fine, but as soon as you get past "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness", you find these outrageous statements: "That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness."

You see why reading this in public is a crime? Imagine what would happen if the people of this country knew that this document is more a statement of who we are as a constitutional republic than even the Constitution. Imagine if all of us were to demand that the federal government be altered or abolished. It would be a revolution, even if we were to demand that the government follow their oaths of office and support the current Constitution.

But that probably won't happen. Too many of us are glued to the idiotic TV, thinking about American Idol or some inconsequential football or baseball game, the rest are fiddling with their phones while driving, twittering and tweeting nonesense about their boring lives, suddenly given meaning by technology to bore others with it in real time. The Food Channel, what could be more important these days than food? Let's have a competition, pass the popcorn, kick back and watch people cooking to win a prize. Perhaps that's the best some people can do, that's their level of involvement: spectators to the lives of others. Politicians and bankers steal our country and everyting in it, devalue our money, raise our taxes, impose an absurd health care scam on us, and the government sells off parts of our country to China, including the only deep water port on the west coast, and we sleep soundly, unaware that we are being slowly packaged for delivery to another power.

We've been sold, and our children will be born into slavery, and their children, and theirs. It's a done deal, unless we wake up, turn off the TV, put down our gadgets and get involved with our future. What will you answer your children when they ask why you didn't stop the hijacking of our country by bankers and politicians? Will you tell them that TV was more important than they are? That football and the Food Channel took all of your time? Or will you admit that you were spinless and couldn't face the responsibility of saving them from slavery? After all, you did your part - you voted those bastards into office, expecting that they would do what they promised. But when they didn't, and instead got drunk with power, and used that power to destroy our country, what did you do? Do something, so your children, and God, will be proud of you. "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men to do nothing: -Edmund Burke

BLOG

Check it out

VIDEO  OF
THE WEEK

For Your
Awakening


You Can Help
Support
this web site

NEW DVD
On Growing
Survival Food

BOB Videos

*NEW*
SOLAR
GENERATOR
For
Emergency
Power

Gun Grab video


TEN THINGS
You Can  Do
To    Survive


"This year will go down in history. For the first time, a civilized nation has full gun registration!
Our streets will be safer, our Federal Police will be more efficient, and the world will follow our lead into the future!"

Adolph Hitler

Passing of the German Weapons Act in 1935


"Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable."
John F Kennedy


Americans are
nine times
more likiely to be killed by police than by terrorists.


The supreme law of this land, The Constitution, has not granted power to the federal government to regulate, register or control guns. The Second Amendment specifically states that the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. What part of "shall not be infringed" does the government not understand?


Voting for a political party is like choosing the color of the car that is going to run you over.


"A free people ought not only to be armed and disciplined, but they should have sufficient arms and ammunition to maintain a status of independence from any who might attempt to abuse them, which would include their own government."

George Washington